Re: The future of gup in developer and bugzilla
- From: Claus Schwarm <c schwarm gmx net>
- To: gnome-web-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: The future of gup in developer and bugzilla
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:11:51 +0100
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 10:12:29 +0100
Quim Gil <qgil desdeamericaconamor org> wrote:
> This comes from the Usability list.
> En/na Shaun McCance ha escrit:
> > For the record, I'm pretty much completely opposed to relying on
> > live.gnome.org for any real public-facing stuff. For internal
> > planning and sketching, fine. But it's a wasteland of broken
> > navigation. Why should half our site look and feel different
> > than the rest?
> I agree with this distinction between "public-facing stuff" and
> "internal planning and sketching".
The argument is false:
* The broken navigation is due to people not caring about the wiki.
This is due to happen with a CMS too when more people take part in
the CMS. The reason is GNOMEs size.
* The look is just different to the rest of the pages because nobody
fixed the layout yet. There was once a rocking CSS by someone but
Jeff Waugh said, he had one too and so it was never applied.
Unfortunatly, I'm not able to find it in the web ML archive. It was
* lgo will always be exposed to the public; if not by us then by
others: fans, friends, and -- most important -- the media. This is
the WorldWideWeb: Everybody is able to make links to inner pages of
the wiki. That happens because GNOME is an important project in the
] [Thread Prev