En/na Claus Schwarm ha escrit: > (although I wish he would document the progress in a wiki page). You're absolutely right. I've started http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb_2fPlatform Feel free to wiki. > The current way is not bad by definition; it's a mess but it works. But > we could do lots of stuff before we *really* need to change its backend > completely, IMHO. I personally prefer to push the revamp process. Its more messy at the begginning, yes, but it may bring us to the real solutions instead of short term patches. I'm not against patching the current site if it needs to, but most of the energies should be devoted in developing the new, mid term solutions. Otherwise we might get double amount of work at the end of next year. > However, if we agree on a change: Why not make it a proper pitch? Yes, we need real and widely agreed steps forward. -- Quim Gil - http://desdeamericaconamor.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature