Re: Validated HTML/CSS

[Joshua Eichorn <jeichorn JoshuaEichorn com>]

I guess im insane its just header background image looks weird with how 
its cut.  Makes it look like 2 images instead of one complete one.
-josh
digitect mindspring com wrote:

> > > This validates (W3C) without errors as HTML 4.01 Transitional and
> CSS2.
>
> > > So if you're using anything less than Moz 9.3 or IE 5.5 it won't look
> > > exactly right. (If you're using Netscape 4x it will look positively
> > > barbaric.) Even IE 5.5 doesn't right justify the top navigation bar's
> > > text.
> > Looks good to me in a recent moz nightly.  Though it would be nice to
> > some example links in the menu, since im asuming that
> > they will highlight differently then standard links in the body.  And
> > the graphic in the upper right doesn't match up with the rest
> > of the graphic to the left.
>
> Not sure what you mean about the graphics not matching up... there are
> no graphics in the upper right, just a background color. Do you mean
> that the color doesn't quite match between the image and the rest of
> that nav bar? (Sounds like a 16-bit X color depth problem if so. I would
> have to re-extend the graphic back to 1600px+ in width to solve it.
> Shucks! I was trying to save a second or two for the 56k folks.  :)
>
> Steve Hall  [ digitect mindspring com ]