> > Thanks. As we mention here, > http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/tasks.html#ApprovingFreezeBreaks > , we need to know that the maintainer has approved this, so that we don't > seem to be overruling the maintainer. I think that you mentioned to me on > IRC that the current function name was the maintainer's choice. Has that > changed? I'm OK with that change. When I talked with gicmo about that change, it seemed to be a mistake, I don't think Alex asked specifically asked for that function to be called like that, especially given the name of the other functions. He is away for about 10 days though, so he won't be able to confirm/infirm that soon :-/ Christophe > > > Murray Cumming > murrayc murrayc com > www.murrayc.com > www.openismus.com > _______________________________________________ > gnome-vfs-list mailing list > gnome-vfs-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=