RE: I was wondering if gnome-vfs supports scp

[Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 09:59, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 09:20 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 12:11, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> 
> > > The question is, is it worth the effort?
> > 
> > I personally don't think so. People running ssh1 servers should upgrade
> > anyway. Aren't they considered unsecure now? ssh.com says:
> > 
> > You can also connect to Secure Shell protocol version 1 (SSH1) servers.
> > With the SSH1 Connections selection you can allow SSH1 connections,  
> > deny them, or issue a warning when connecting to a remote host computer
> > that is using version 1 of the Secure Shell protocol. 
> > Secure Shell protocol version 2 (SSH2) is a more advanced and secure
> > protocol than the legacy version SSH1. SSH Communications Security
> > considers the SSH1 protocol deprecated and does not recommend its use
> > anymore.
> 
> 
> I understand,
> 
> In that case we are not going to put efforts in trying to support the
> old scp-method. It might still be nice, however, to alias the scp://
> uri-prefix to the sftp://-prefix. Thats just a suggestion.

Why? Is anyone else using this? Where would you get that kind of uris
from?

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl redhat com    alla lysator liu se 
He's a fast talking neurotic gentleman spy on his last day in the job. She's a 
manipulative blonde hooker from a different time and place. They fight crime!