Re: ioctls for gnome-vfs
- From: Alex Graveley <alex ximian com>
- To: Joe Shaw <joe ximian com>
- Cc: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>, gnome-vfs-list gnome org, yakk yakk net
- Subject: Re: ioctls for gnome-vfs
- Date: 15 Nov 2002 16:13:12 -0500
Hi,
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 15:09, Joe Shaw wrote:
> I'm not so sure. Maybe it's just the terminology, but "metadata" to me
> means any arbitrary information layered on top of files, probably
> persistent. Image thumbnailing seems like a good use of metadata to
> me.
>
> This seems more like additional parameters on the method itself...
> things like setting HTTP headers for a specific request or passive mode
> on FTP.
I think it depends completely on the metadata being twiddled. For
instance: idealy we would want metadata stored on an mp3 and prefixed
with "id3-tag:" to be stored in the id3 section of the file itself.
Just as likely is setting headers in an http transfer, before a read or
write; in this case the meta-data should only be available for setting
on an open file handle, and not on a URI.
Also an issue for me is the that i can't think of any good reason for a
file-control api. We don't expose sockets or file descriptors. Ans the
example that alexl posted is certainly metadata and not an ioctl, since
the attribute is associated with a file and would presumably remain for
its lifetime.
-Alex
--
on the canvass of life, incompetence is my paintbrush.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]