Re: [Fwd: en_GB translation of "trash"]
- From: Etenil <etenil etenilsrealm nl>
- To: Gnome-uk-list <Gnome-uk-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: en_GB translation of "trash"]
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:07:27 +0200
While waiting at the London city airport, I noticed the bins there have
"Litter Bin" written on the top.
Otherwise, wastebasket seems OK to me. "deleted items folder" would be
way too long!!
-
----Original Message-----T
o: Aidan Delaney <aidan delaney gmail com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: en_GB translation of "trash"]
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:47:46 +0100
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 11:57 +0100, Aidan Delaney wrote:
> Bruce et. al.,
> On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 00:06 +0100, Bruce Cowan wrote:
> > Personally, I like "bin", but that has other meanings.
> At the risk of bikeshedding - My general preference would be to not
> change such user visible things on minor or micro releases, but only on
> major releases. I.e. change on Gnome 1 -> 2 or 2 -> 3 but not on
> 2.30->2.32. Small changes, such as this, can have a disproportionate
> effect on novice and intermediate users.
Well, GNOME 2.32 is going to be 3.0.
> As to what exactly to call the waste/recycle/bin thingy, maybe the best
> people to ask are the Canonical user design people in London?
They would no doubt suggest the strange and unwieldy "deleted items
folder".
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]