On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 08:44, Luca Ferretti wrote: > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 14:46, Jakub Steiner wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 13:13, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > > * shadow (should) follows the table prospective > > > > That makes little sense to me. A paper would rarely stand up like that > > True, but folders too ;-) Note that current gnome-folder is using a > similar shadow (IMHO Industrial one seem more cool and realistic, but > there are more pixels :-P) Industrial folder is SVG. That doesn't count ;) > OK, it's not realistic, but it can add consistence to the Desktop and > it's the HIG suggestion... It looks weird in the first place. > I vote for it, but I'm not so sure that it should be managed via some > code (you have to use in all apps that needs mime icon: search tool, > file roller, eventually file selector and so on..) I ment using a script to generate the merged pngs, at least for a start. No change in any of the apps code necessary. > If I remember well old Eazel icons was 48x52 too, so Toumas is partially > innocent :-) And I thought I was soo good at blaming other other people ;) -- Jakub Steiner <jimmac ximian com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part