On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 13:13, Luca Ferretti wrote: > Changes: > * it's 48x48, don't 48x52 (note that currently we have 48x48 > folders) Yeah. that was a silly thing to introduce. > * shadow (should) follows the table prospective That makes little sense to me. A paper would rarely stand up like that and looks a little weird to me. I'd revert to the simple dropshadow thing. > * no tray holes (are they needed?) Against the HIG I always thought adding detail is good. Maybe it's not. > * same ratio then GTK_STOK_OPEN (little ear) > > Troubles: > * we need to rebuild all mime icons using this one as base > (removing extension label as HIG said?) Because we'll be redoing all this, I'd rather go for doing 32x32 mime-emblems, and use imagemagick or something to overlay it on a document base, eventually having nautilus do that. I'll think about it and start doing that and file appropriate bugs. > To use a 48x52 icon is an HIG violation? If don't should we build a > 48x52 folder icon? Tuomas introduced the weird size because the text label (another bad decision) wouldn't fit. It should be 48x48. tada! -- Jakub Steiner <jimmac ximian com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part