Re: Gnome Shell Extensions isn't shipped with Gnome Shell, WHY?!

[Clemens <clemens lab21 org>]

Am Mi 22 Aug 2012 12:57:12 CEST schrieb Jonathan Wilkes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Adam  Tauno Williams <awilliam whitemice org>
> > To: gnome-shell-list gnome org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 6:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: Gnome Shell Extensions isn't shipped with Gnome Shell, WHY?!
> >
> > On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:12 +0200, Florian Scandella wrote:
> > >   I like how gnome uses
> > >   (and drives) development of freedesktop standards instead of reinventing
> > >   everything and hacking arount short term limitations.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > >   So while i'm happy with gnome-shell, i'm all for integrating some
> > of the
> > >   most used extensions into the core, with an option to enable/disable them.
> >
> > I disagree,  core should remain thin so people can easily go in whatever
> > direction they want.  Verses the old first-I-go-remove-all-this-crap.
>
> How much "thicker" does the core get by having a restart menu item in the
> status menu?
>
> -Jonathan
>
> > Note that distributions can bundle and enable whatever extensions they
> > want.  openSUSE packages several.  And distribution packages of GNOME
> > are what end-users actually install and use.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-shell-list mailing list
> > gnome-shell-list gnome org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-shell-list mailing list
> gnome-shell-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

As far is i know, the poweroff/reboot buttons were removed/are hidden 
because
suspend is a) more efficient (time + powerconsumption) b) many people 
only use
suspend and never poweroff there macine c) suspend is working an nearly 
all devices

(most of the time a shutdown my notebook using a terminal )