Re: Notes looking at sweettooth-plugin



On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Giovanni Campagna
<scampa giovanni gmail com> wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 11/09/2011 alle 16.40 -0400, Owen Taylor ha scritto:
>> On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 14:57 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:24:18AM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> wrote:
>> > > > Some review comments reading the code to sweettooth-plugin:
>> >
>> > What is/will be the status for GNOME 3.2? I'm writing (together with
>> > others) the release notes and I'd like to say something about this.
>> >
>> > even if not for GNOME 3.2, we could put it in the "looking forward"
>> > section (but then really brief)
>> >
>> > if it is going to be ready, some screenshots would be nice. Ok to give
>> > me links and so on or tell me how to create screenshots.
>>
>> The client side stuff is largely there to make the site work, but it's
>> not widely tested yet, and the server side is still very much a work
>> in progress.
>>
>> I think what makes sense is to have the site as a bit of a stealth-beta
>> for this release ... something we're still working on, something we
>> don't advertise as a release feature, but something that you can already
>> use.
>
> Which means that extension.gnome.org will be up and running (even if
> beta) in 3.2?
> I'm asking because I want to move my extensions to the website as soon
> as possible, and I'd like to know for how long I'll need to make tarball
> releases. I already skipped 3.1.90 / 3.1.91, hoping to have the website
> soon, but distro packagers will need 3.1.92 and 3.2.0 if they have to
> keep the packages.
>
> Giovanni
>

For now, keep building tarballs.

-- 
  Jasper


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]