Re: The good, the bad, the insane
- From: Ryan Peters <sloshy45 sbcglobal net>
- To: "Allan E. Registos\(x-mail\)" <allan_registos lavabit com>, gnome-shell-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: The good, the bad, the insane
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:03:11 -0500
On 05/23/2011 06:47 PM, Allan E. Registos(x-mail) wrote:
On Monday, 23 May, 2011 10:13 PM, Ryan Peters wrote:
Before I say anything, let me state that I am not a developer or
designer of this project. From what I've read *from* the designers,
though, the decision was made for consistency's sake, not necessarily
saving energy. The menu has the same function that the power button
and closing the window list do: suspending. Shutting down, when you
think about it, is something that you rarely have to do (some people
don't shut down their desktops for long periods of time, while others
only shut them down once or twice per day). Compared to navigating a
program's GUI, switching workspaces/windows, and launching
applications, this is something that is rarely done, so, for the sake
of consistency, it would make sense to optimize towards a behavior
that, for most users, would be preferable when walking away
(suspending). The preferred way to shut down, which indicates that
you're done using the computer, is to log out first and use GDM
(which takes a few more seconds, but I can't think of a situation
where you have to shut down a computer faster that that).
Pressing the alt-button shows the Power Off button, logging out so
that you can shutdown requires more work and delay especially after
work where a quick shutdown is badly needed. That design decision
again was discussed in length and that is invalid, it works obviously
to the designer's laptops while the rest of the desktop world are
suffering.
When was this made "invalid"; are there plans to reverse the decision? I
haven't read of this. Or, by "invalid", do you mean "we would like it
the other way"? I'm not saying you're wrong, I only want to clarify, as
I haven't read anything about the decision being reversed. Also, I use a
desktop, and I can't see how holding the Alt key for a second or logging
out is really such a big deal. It's unnecessary, sure, but it isn't
exactly "the end of the world" as I hear so many people saying. It
reminds me of the decision to not use minimize/maximize buttons by
default; you can still maximize other ways, and it makes the desktop
feel more consistent and minimal by default.
How much harder is it to press the Alt key and click? I don't mean to
sound rude, and I'm sorry if I come across as that, but it really is an
incredibly small regression if you think about it, relative to some
other problems like over-crowded settings dialogs not being visible on
small screens. Even yelp, the GNOME 3 help program, tells users how to
shut down (with the Alt key as well as the preferred method), so the new
behavior is just as discoverable as any other keyboard shortcut.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]