Re: Gnome-Shell - questions and opinions
- From: Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com>
- To: Bojan Smojver <bojan rexursive com>
- Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, gnome-shell-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gnome-Shell - questions and opinions
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 02:17:01 +0000
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 10:17 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 23:06 +0000, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I'm not sure to what extent you can expect people to make this leap.
>
> So, what you're saying is that people understand that they can have
> multiple "home screens" (which are completely not static - they in fact
> all have apps of one kind or another running on them), but they could
> never grok "workspaces". I find that hard to believe.
These are always called 'widgets', and not 'apps'. The two are
considered quite distinct.
And you vastly overstate my argument. I phrased it, intentionally, very
mildly; please do not presume to put the word 'never' in my mouth.
> Just look at various Android "home screen" UIs. Some of them even have
> "pinch to zoom" on any home screen, where you actually get all home
> screens visible at the same time and you pick one you want. In that
> representation they are spaces, for all intents and purposes (they are
> just not called spaces). Some phone web browsers are working the same
> way as well.
That ignores the point that applications are not associated with
particular home screens.
> So, extending this metaphor to the desktop is a no-brainer. Give users
> credit - vast majority of them already to this stuff every day.
The vast majority of people do not use smartphones. However, I'm not a
fan of the 'vast majority' line of argument in general, so let's leave
it there.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]