Hi! > Ok, we'll stick with dconf-editor at the moment. > But I have a little, slightly off-topic remark, at the moment : > Having something which default experience is classy out of the box > should not require "killing settings", just adjusting them well by > default. What's so bad about wanting to adjust stuff ? > It would be really too bad to have a tweakui outside the shell : it > would only be able to tune stuff that the shell allows it to tune, > i.e. not much at the moment. > It is quite odd having set up such an extension system and, > afterwards, having to set their settings in something external which > is outside the Shell experience ? I would like so much to have a > "Shell settings" inside the control panel ! > Don't get me wrong, I really like the gnome-shell experience, but I'm > puzzled by the loss of adjustability I feel compared to gnome 2 (not > to mention Compiz...). There is a very reasonable comment by a german computer magazin about this issue and why it is the right way. It is available in German only though: http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/Die-Woche-Gnome-weiss-es-besser-1183775.html Regards, Johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part