Re: GNOME 3 from Fedora user's perpective - request for changes
- From: JB <jb 1234abcd gmail com>
- To: gnome-shell-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 3 from Fedora user's perpective - request for changes
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:51:38 +0000 (UTC)
Olav Vitters <olav@...> writes:
> ...
I wanted you to see the problem thru the eyes of a Fedora user and other
non-technical business end users.
GNOME does not live in a vacuum - without a broad user base it will become
marginal and eventually disappear.
> > I find GNOME 3 menu system dysfunctional and an example of inexperience:
>
> As suggested in > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-
> April/098603.html
> could you please provide concrete evidence? We're open to feedback, but
> that requires more than opinions. We have enough of those :)
Sorry. I feel I provided it, and it is not "just an opinion" but a description
of a really screwed up menu system.
> ...
> Configurable option won't happen; that'll mean you want something
> supported by the GNOME shell developers. But GNOME shell can be fully
> customized. You (or anyone) can write an extension which does (almost)
> whatever you want. Supported by whomever writes the extension.
> ...
Before we ask non-technical business end users to get lost and write some
extensions to fix problems GNOME 3 delivered to them, there is still a hope
that GNOME devs fix the menu systems themselves.
It can be done by anchoring back the new GNOME 3 menu system (minus silly
Activities and Windows, Application sub-menu items) on a fully functional
panel. Bingo. I trust they can do that with one finger, right ? :-)
> ...
> > If not IT (support) people then the business end users will force it upon
> > them and you. Or they will avoid your products as "geeky" and "unreliable".
>
> Such statements are pretty empty imo without some concrete data. For
> instance, I've seen how people interact with the various GNOME shell
> interface. People generally either completely hate it, or love it (this
> is good btw.. GUADEC Vilanova had a great talk about this).
> Seems to be missing some sentences in your arguments. How does a menu
> system relate to "unreliable"?
>
I really think that the new menu system is a prank.
Put brown bags over your heads and get over it :-)
Fix it (see above how) and you will be lovely and "reliable" geeks again ...
JB
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]