Re: Re: Re: A task panel

[Kao Chen <kaochen2 gmail com>]

I think its can be a very important things, the fact that we can move  panels where we want, to fit to each of our configurations.
We can  easily see the top panel going to the bottom, notifications can be reverse with the top or attach to a side.
And my sidebar can be move to all the side or being totally remove if you don't want it.

It will be hard for dev to do a such thing, but users need to be capable to easily adapt their interfaces to their needs.

All configurations can be supported by an adaptable interface. It's one of the great power of Gnome 2.30.

2010/5/23 <kaddy080 gmail com>

true... it has already been done.... it is pretty much like unity
I prefer the mockup that sombody did... (forgot who it was, sorry) but I suggested it about a week ago and somebody did a mockup of a panel dock.....
the panel dock is awesome whoever made it... good work

On , Rovanion Luckey <rovanion luckey gmail com> wrote:
>
> If we need space I know where we can find it.
> The top bar is already full, the bottom is occupied by notifications (i love the Chat).
>
> The right side needs to stay clean, in case of dual screen.
>
>  
>  There are those rare cases where people use three or even more screens, so it's not necessarily free to use. But on the other hand, some may have the second screen above the first one so all it comes down to is allowing the user to move and customize the shell. All cases cannot be satisfied with one model.
>
>
>
> So, rest the left side of the screen.
>
> We have wide screens now, I think we can add a little panel, without losing so much space. I have simply stretched  the top panel to the left side. The old sidebar reborn from the ashes.
> So what do you think about this:
>
>
> http://nsa15.casimages.com/img/2010/05/23/10052311250411117.png
>  
>
> This looks pritty much like what Mark Shuttleworth has planned out for Ubuntu 10.10's Unity interface. It's meant to be complementary to Gnome Shell: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/383
>
>
> Tough your mockup looks much better than the Canonical implementation.
>
> --
> www.twitter.com/Rovanion
>
>
>
>