Re: libreadline

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com> writes: 
>   Hum, isn't there a more obvious problem with libreadline ? Last time
> I checked it was GPL not LGPL, so no GNOME library should require it
> (though it's fine for apps to require it), otherwise the problems associated
> with strictly GPL'ed libraries arose.
>   Can someone clarify our requirement on libreadline ?

librep probably uses it for its Lisp command prompt. I think this
means any app using the readline rep module must be GPL; I doubt any
app other than sawfish will use rep, let alone its readline
module. ;-)

Havoc