On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 17:13 -0400, Jody Goldberg wrote:
> I was at the lsm printing summit last week and have not given this a
> thorough review yet. The short answer is that I'd like it to go in,
> but have a few suggestions for afterward.
Ok, great! The major remaining issues as I see them are:
o What to do with Settings
o Different icons for local printers/print to file? Toss icons
entirely?
o Handling print to file better?
Anything else?
> Using a list is
> definitely better than the combo or a window's style icon list.
> However, I'd like to do a more complete audit before you commit.
> Specificly to see what libgnomeprint changes the ui change requires
> eg start/start polling
In terms of API? There is the GPAState element, and three new methods
on GPAPrinter: gpa_printer_set_polling and
gpa_printer_get_state{,_by_id}.
But in terms of the overall approach and implementation (making the
printer list dynamic and showing state), the libgnomeprintui patch
depends on pretty much all of the libgnomeprint patch.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part