Re: [gpm] =?iso-8859-2?q?ACPI_S1_-_Standby?=
- From: "kapetr" <kapetr mizera cz>
- To: gnome-power-manager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gpm] ACPI S1 - Standby
- Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:00:12 +0100 (CET)
Does it mean, that you are from [gpm] developer team ?
If yes - don't you mean that other should have the choice - even if
you don't thing it is useful ? Or do you thing, that yours truth is
the only right ?!
BTW - I had explain my arguments why me (and many others) see S1 as
useful - refute them, if you can.
--kapetr
----- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -----
Od: "Richard Hughes" <hughsient gmail com>
Komu: "kapetr" <kapetr mizera cz>
Předmět: Re: [gpm] ACPI S1 - Standby
Datum: 20.2.2011 - 17:44:07
> 2011/2/20 kapetr <kapetr mizera cz>:
> > If someone ask in Forum a question: "How to do
> > something", then the
> > > Answer, which absolutely do NOT want hear is
> > such containing only:
> > > "Why do you want to do that ?".
>
> No. Just because something is possible does not
> make it a good idea to
> do it. S1 is not something I want to support,
> sorry.
>
> Richard.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]