On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 08:04 -0400, David A. Desrosiers wrote: > ..and I'm guilty of not filing these either. I'll see what I can do. I > need to set aside a chunk of time and really pour through this and do > some aggressive testing before I file these as "current" bugs. Lucky me.. I just found a large section of g-p that needs updating to remain current with pilot-link 0.12's API (using gp from CVS, not the release pre tarballs). I'll pick through it and start cooking up patches. I was trying to fix the disclean issue, but distcheck dies deep in gnome-pilot-conduit-standard-abs because of the deprecated API and some invalid buffer constructs. Do we really need to retain backward compatibility here? All of these #ifdefs are going to double the size of most of the source files if we keep them in there, because of all of the changes. I'll just rip out the 0.11.x bits, rip out the #ifdefs and make it work against 0.12.x and someone else can work on the backporting if they need it. Back to more yak-shaving to fix this up. -- David A. Desrosiers desrod gnu-designs com http://gnu-designs.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part