Re: pilot-link versioning (was: Re: GnomePilot problems)
- From: Ben Darnell <bgdarnel unity ncsu edu>
- To: Colin Walters <levanti verbum org>
- Cc: hacker downcity net, gnome-pilot-list gnome org, bgdarnel debian org
- Subject: Re: pilot-link versioning (was: Re: GnomePilot problems)
- Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:40:01 -0500
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 02:30:43AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> >>>>> ""David" == "David Desrosiers <hacker@gnu-designs.com>" <hacker@downcity.net> writes:
>
> David> Point being... 0.9.3. is the only/latest/official version,
> David> and you should be using that. 0.9.4, though numerically
> David> appears to be a more recent version, is actually about 6
> David> months older than 0.9.3, and doesn't include many fixes
> David> that 0.9.3 provides.
>
> Have you submitted your patches to the canonical source for
> pilot-link? That's where the Debian pilot-link maintainer surely gets
> their sources, and this could be very confusing. I've CC'ed the
> Debian package maintainer.
The Debian package is version 0.9.3, from
ftp://ryeham.ee.ryerson.ca/pub/PalmOS/pilot-link.0.9.3.tar.gz
pi-version.h in this distribution says version 0.9.4 (I don't know why,
and I don't want to change it since other programs may be looking for
that version number). That's the source of the version number Micah
reported. The Debian package has a number of bugfixes applied to it as
well; is anyone working on an updated release of pilot-link?
-Ben
--
Ben Darnell bgdarnel@unity.ncsu.edu
http://thoughtstream.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]