Re: License problem with Re: AvantGo



On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, [iso-8859-1] Erik Bågfors wrote:
> 
> If we want gnome-pilot to be a big success we must allow non-free conduits 
> to be built ontop of it.  If not, no comercial company will write conduits 
> for gnome-pilot (unless they are GPL-fans).
> 
> The gnome-pilot-libraries shouldn be LGPL IMHO.  This doesn't mean that the 
> rest of gnome-pilot should be LGPL but at least the libraries.

i also feel that making gpilotd libs LGPL is the way to go. the rest
of gnome-pilot should stay GPL. if you look at pilot-link, they also
chose to do it in this way. libpisock is LGPL - that is why
malsync (non GPL) can use it! - and the rest is GPL. 

patrick.

-------------------------------------------o-------------------------------
Patrick Decowski                           |
24-507                                     |    Home:      (617)625-9352
Massachusetts Institute of Technology      |    Cell:      (617)308-6737
77 Massachusetts Ave                       |    Office:    (617)253-1779
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307                   |    Fax:       (617)253-1755
-------------------------------------------o-------------------------------
http://web.mit.edu/decowski/www/home.html  |    e-mail: decowski@mit.edu
-------------------------------------------o-------------------------------



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]