Re: gnome-office website (was Re: We're removed from FC2 ?)

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>]

On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 14:43 +0000, Dave Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 10:52, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 23:44 +0000, Oliver Burnett-Hall wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 04:47, Jody Goldberg wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:13:36AM +0100, Marc Maurer wrote:
> > > > > For a start, we should update the GOffice homepage, which has this
> > > > > "Gnome Office is actually a meta-project" nonsense on it. Then, we
> > > > > should become a 'real' office suit, with a select group of high
> > > > > quality _office_ applications.
> > > > 
> > > > Amen.
> > > > It boils down to resources.  If someone can step up to the plate and
> > > > work on the website it would be a huge help.
> > > 
> > > I'm willing to do this - I've got some ideas for updating/redoing the
> > > existing site and have made a start on this.  I should have something
> > > semi-working in the next week or so.
> > > 
> > > Couple of questions:
> > > 
> > > (1) Where in cvs can I find the existing web pages?   I've had a look
> > > but got annoyed with the ultra-slow web-cvs interface before I could
> > > find anything.
> > > 
> > IIRC, it's in gnomeweb-wml/www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-office
> > 
> > > (2) Which apps should be considered to be part of gnome office these
> > > days?
> > > 
> > so far, abiword, gnumeric are the only apps, along with libgda and
> > libgnomedb as libraries, officially included.
> 
> Conglomerate isn't yet officially included, for stability reasons, but
> we are working towards it.
> 
right, I forgot about it, which is, IIRC, supposed to be in next GO
release, right?

cheers