Re: gnome-office website (was Re: We're removed from FC2 ?)



On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 10:52, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 23:44 +0000, Oliver Burnett-Hall wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 04:47, Jody Goldberg wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:13:36AM +0100, Marc Maurer wrote:
> > > > For a start, we should update the GOffice homepage, which has this
> > > > "Gnome Office is actually a meta-project" nonsense on it. Then, we
> > > > should become a 'real' office suit, with a select group of high
> > > > quality _office_ applications.
> > > 
> > > Amen.
> > > It boils down to resources.  If someone can step up to the plate and
> > > work on the website it would be a huge help.
> > 
> > I'm willing to do this - I've got some ideas for updating/redoing the
> > existing site and have made a start on this.  I should have something
> > semi-working in the next week or so.
> > 
> > Couple of questions:
> > 
> > (1) Where in cvs can I find the existing web pages?   I've had a look
> > but got annoyed with the ultra-slow web-cvs interface before I could
> > find anything.
> > 
> IIRC, it's in gnomeweb-wml/www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-office
> 
> > (2) Which apps should be considered to be part of gnome office these
> > days?
> > 
> so far, abiword, gnumeric are the only apps, along with libgda and
> libgnomedb as libraries, officially included.

Conglomerate isn't yet officially included, for stability reasons, but
we are working towards it.

Don't know if that's enough to give us at least a mention somewhere on
the site; probably on a separate page - I think it's important to
maintain a distinction between the highly stable and polished
Abiword/Gnumeric, and the rest of us out there.

> 
> cheers
-- 
David Malcolm
www.conglomerate.org




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]