Re: gnome-office website (was Re: We're removed from FC2 ?)
- From: Dave Malcolm <david davemalcolm demon co uk>
- To: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- Cc: Oliver Burnett-Hall <olly burnett-hall co uk>, abiword-dev abisource com, gnome-office-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome-office website (was Re: We're removed from FC2 ?)
- Date: 04 Feb 2004 14:43:30 +0000
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 10:52, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 23:44 +0000, Oliver Burnett-Hall wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 04:47, Jody Goldberg wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:13:36AM +0100, Marc Maurer wrote:
> > > > For a start, we should update the GOffice homepage, which has this
> > > > "Gnome Office is actually a meta-project" nonsense on it. Then, we
> > > > should become a 'real' office suit, with a select group of high
> > > > quality _office_ applications.
> > >
> > > Amen.
> > > It boils down to resources. If someone can step up to the plate and
> > > work on the website it would be a huge help.
> > I'm willing to do this - I've got some ideas for updating/redoing the
> > existing site and have made a start on this. I should have something
> > semi-working in the next week or so.
> > Couple of questions:
> > (1) Where in cvs can I find the existing web pages? I've had a look
> > but got annoyed with the ultra-slow web-cvs interface before I could
> > find anything.
> IIRC, it's in gnomeweb-wml/www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-office
> > (2) Which apps should be considered to be part of gnome office these
> > days?
> so far, abiword, gnumeric are the only apps, along with libgda and
> libgnomedb as libraries, officially included.
Conglomerate isn't yet officially included, for stability reasons, but
we are working towards it.
Don't know if that's enough to give us at least a mention somewhere on
the site; probably on a separate page - I think it's important to
maintain a distinction between the highly stable and polished
Abiword/Gnumeric, and the rest of us out there.
] [Thread Prev