Re: gnome-recent, ready to rock

On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 19:31, Miles Lane wrote:
> On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 15:43, Christopher James Lahey wrote:
> <snip>
> > Putting this in gal seems fine to me.  The only thing I'm at all
> > concerned with is that gal doesn't currently depend on gconf.
> > 
> > However, if this is a gnome2 library and gnome-libs2 depends on gconf,
> > we can totally change this for the gnome2 port of gal.
> > 
> > I'm totally up for integrating this.  We should talk more when the
> > gnome2 port of gal builds up steam.
> Any idea when GAL porting work might begin?  It will need to 
> precede the porting of Gnumeric and Evolution, correct? 
> Also, do you have any idea whether Ximian plans to have 
> ported versions of Gnumeric and Evolution for Gnome 2.0 at
> launch?

As far as things go, it seems like this port is going to be pretty
simple.  Michael has already done a lot of work that is in the 1.0
branch that makes the 2.0 port much easier.  I'm not sure what's missing
from that.  Michael?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]