Re: What is GNOME office?
- From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel Veillard w3 org>
- To: Dom Lachowicz <cinamod hotmail com>
- Cc: Daniel Veillard w3 org, msevior mccubbin ph unimelb edu au, miguel helixcode com, lauris helixcode com, foundation-list gnome org, gnome-office-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: What is GNOME office?
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 23:50:09 +0100
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 03:54:45PM -0500, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >I would be really interested on feedback on this especially the generic
> >package proposal.
> >Also did you tried to compare your XML format and OpenOffice one, are the
> >structure fundamentally different or do using XSLT to transform from one
> >format to the other seems doable ?
>
> I was planning on looking at the OpenOffice DTDs/Specs/etc over the weekend.
> There are like 20 DTDs though and amount to about 300 pages of information
> (as opposed to ~120 for RTF). Granted, they do cover every detail under the
> sun for WPs, SpreadSheets, etc... so the wordiness is warranted.
yes that's a very large and complete doc, which is good but takes a while
to review (I didn't had time myself, I just looked at the output for a couple
of simple documents and it looks 'sane').
> I wasn't planning on using XSLT to convert between formats. This may or may
> not be doable with XSLT in its current state, but I'll know that for sure
> after this weekend (i.e. the doc may need some complex transformations to
> get from OO->ABW that XSLT can't yet handle). For now, I was planning on
> just subclassing our generic XML importer class to handle as many OO
> tags/features as possible like our existing 5 or so XML importers currently
> do.
Okay this is sensible too, a bit more hardwired, but probably easier
to set-up.
> It shouldn't involve too much code that way and doesn't involve an
> intermediate conversion step (we treat our ABW importer/exporter as just
> another importer/exporter that "happens" to have a very clean mapping to our
> internal structure). Then comes the OO exporter, which should be done at
> about the same time.
I noticed something in your answer which raised my attention, it
was "round tripping Docbook". How complete is this ? Is this based on the
XML Docbook DTD or the SGML version ? I sent a query to the XML-Dev list
about free Docbook editors and the only hint I got back was about a KWrite
patch. How long do you think it would take to have something suitable for
the GNOME doc team (including some non-trivial thing like external parsed
entities and/or validation) ?
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard w3 org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes | libxml Gnome XML toolkit
Tel : +33 476 615 257 | 655, avenue de l'Europe | http://xmlsoft.org/
Fax : +33 476 615 207 | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | Rpmfind search site
http://www.w3.org/People/all#veillard%40w3.org | http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]