Re: What is GNOME office?
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Sam TH <sam uchicago edu>
- Cc: gnome-office-list gnome org, Bart Decrem <bart eazel com>, Daniel Veillard w3 org, Mike Kestner <mkestner ameritech net>, Dick Porter <dick+gnome acm org>, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: What is GNOME office?
- Date: 15 Nov 2000 19:15:01 -0500
Sam TH <sam uchicago edu> writes:
> First, I wonder about your phrasing there. Are you suggesting that
> OO will become the GNOME office suite once it does those things? Is
> this set in stone?
>
Not suggesting that.
> Second, I don't think that waiting until OO does all of those things
> is what Bart had in mind, in the email I was replying to. Personally,
> I expect OpenOffice to have a ramp-up time at least comparable to
> that of Mozilla, that is, long. And so GNOME is going to have to
> make decisions before all of that happens. For example, Sun is
> going around telling anyone who will listen that the decision has
> been made, and that OpenOffice is the new GNOME office. And I don't
> see anyone from GNOME challenging that view. So GNOME, and probably
> the board, will have to decide what the composition of GNOME office
> will be, before everything you want to get done gets done.
For now I'm willing to take a "wait and see" attitude on what we have
to decide when - it's just not clear to me at least what we
can/should/would decide and when we should do it. So I'd advocate
doing nothing until we feel there's a clear answer.
> And as to those specific items, I know they plan to address 1 and 2,
> but the Sun developers I've corresponded with seem to view 3 as a
> feature. And as to 4, I'll believe it when I see it.
>
The board will probably dedicate a meeting to this, and should get a
much better idea of what's possible and how Sun sees the
situation. Then it will be a lot clearer what the issues are.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]