Re: GNOME-media on the road to 2.4.0
- From: Richard Stallman <rms gnu org>
- To: Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <uraeus gnome org>
- Cc: gnome-multimedia gnome org, hp redhat com
- Subject: Re: GNOME-media on the road to 2.4.0
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:19:12 -0400
GStreamer is and has always been LGPL
The LGPL permits linking with non-free programs, and that includes
dynamic linking with plug-ins. However, the same issue would arise
for a GPL-covered application program that includes GStreamer.
Well the problem at hand here is that we have GStreamer a LGPL framework,
we have libraries under the LGPL and GPL implementing codecs and
containers formats that might be covered by patents in some countries.
The libraries have GStreamer plugins made for them. We then have GPL
applications who calls upon these libraries using GStreamer. So the
question is if the applications can legally be distributed in countries
where patents might apply or if GStreamer insulates them from the GPL vs
Patent conflict.
If the distributors of GStreamer and of the applications don't
distribute these plug-ins, but rather refer to the sites which do, and
if GStreamer or the plug-in distributors say that use of these
plug-ins may be restricted in some countries by software patents and
that anyone considering redistributing them in certain countries
should consult a lawyer, that ought to do the job.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]