Re: [gnome-mud] G-M glade branch

[Robin Ericsson <lobbin localhost nu>]

Robin Ericsson wrote:
> Well, this is a good stance in how the future should be, should we 
> release 0.11 based on 0.10 (HEAD branch) which actually work, which the 
> glade branch is far from doing. I haven't looked at either code for some 
> time now, and maybe the best would be to sit down and have a look at 
> current problems, get them on a list together with "wanna have" stuff 
> and then we make a decision, either use glade branch, or we don't :)
> Most issues in bugzilla, 3 bugs and 5 enhancements is a pretty good 
> start I guess.
Both Jordi and Daniel seemed to have read my mind about using a wiki for 
this type of list and created one over at live.gnome.org [1]
I filled in some more from bugzilla and added most from the ROADMAP-fil 
in CVS. Maybe we can get this ball running again.
Ideas:
Fix a few crucial bugs and release 0.11.0, then try to release more 
often where minor version (0.12.0, 0.13.0, etc) consists of new features 
and patch-versions (0.11.1, 0.12.1, etc) consists of bugfixes only.
That should make the development look faster and maybe attract more 
users. Also, being less then version 1 maybe also make users look at 
another client, so maybe we should try to decide what should go into 
1.0.0 release?

regards,
	Robin


1: http://live.gnome.org/GnomeMud