Re: GNOME: Seven Possible Recovery Strategies

[Philip Durbin <philipdurbin gmail com>]

Interesting article. Thanks. I'm still partial to GNOME 2 but I'm keeping an open mind.

Phil

On Aug 19, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Daniel Farley <daniel farley co nz> wrote:

> http://www.datamation.com/open-source/gnome-seven-possible-recovery-strategies-1.html
> 
> Just in response to this as a user of gnome 3, i really like it... i
> have used kde4 as well and have used gnome 2 even more but i really
> like the way gnome 3 works for me how simple and elegant it is, how to
> switch windows with the top left corner and how things keep moving in
> each window when this is happening.  How to start programs/settings by
> just starting to type what i want.    I just find my hardware (Lenovo
> x100e) can only just cope with it and it does seem to slow my computer
> down a bit... and its hard to find  a distribution that supports it
> well.
> 
> I fell i have pretty much enough customizability using the gnome
> extensions, and don't feel the need to traditional menu's at all.
> 
> I know its hard to get the general users to change and like it...  i
> wish it would work on all my hardware better (faster and cope better
> with out graphics acceleration / good graphics acceleration..  or that
> i could turn down what it would try and do for this...
> 
> Keep up the good work guys, im sorry its hard to change the world
> 
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-list mailing list
> gnome-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list