Re: gmc where did it go?
- From: mike <mike redtux demon co uk>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gmc where did it go?
- Date: 18 Sep 2001 02:23:46 +0100
As far as |I am aware - have used straight 1.4 and roswell 1.4 gmc is
still there - just not on menu sometimes (depending on setup) type gmc
in a term nd it should appear - do it all the time to look at rpms an
tar.gz's
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 09:14, jik foxinternet net wrote:
> In using gnome over a LAN connection I further realised that nautilus is
> just WAY too slow to use it for the desktop and filemanager. It offers
> more, but is too heavy to perform that simple task. It is really
> unfortunate that it has taken the place of the old file manager which
> was much lighter and did everything it was supposed to just fine.
>
> That said, where is the old one? I tried finding it on freshmeat and
> the gnome site and couldn't. I think that I would really preffer to use
> it, for the most part I have been not using the desktop because nautilus
> is just too heavy...even on my TBird. Hell, it won't even start up with
> gnome so what the hell?
>
> So if anyone can direct me to gmc cool...and a suggestion to the gnome
> developers...nautilus sucks dog dung. There are just numerous things
> broken about it from a useability standpoint and should never have
> replaced an operational component. Having something that heavy in
> charge of the desktop icons is not at all necissary and was a big big
> mistake.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-list mailing list
> gnome-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]