Re: Request: Test suite for EFS.
- From: Krzysztof Kamieniecki <krys qcsolutions com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Request: Test suite for EFS.
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 12:04:48 -0500
I may just be talking out of my bum ;) however,
Why doesn't everyone work out an interface to
this compound document format library (which i think everyone could agree on)
Then the two (maybe more) camps can make
seperate implementation and then the performance can be compared.
I will now put my pants back on.
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > I think the next generation of smart XML tools is much more important
> > to support than legacy Microsoft tools. Let's design data formats for
> > tomorrow's universe, not today.
> Your phrase, although it sounds very catchy it ignores reality.
> Example: OS of the future: Plan9. OS of today: Unix.
> Did Plan9 ever have a chance? What about BeOS? The Hurd?
> I can go on and on over failed "visionary" systems. Lets stay factual
> here, and leave emotions out of the discussion on whether XML is the
> right format for compound documents.
] [Thread Prev