Re: ORBit versions ?

[Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>]

On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Michael Hall wrote:

>   I normally use cvs and was checkout/update last night after adding some
> '*-1-0' tags (per some recent messages here) and then comparing versions
> against the tarballs from the ftp site. I noticed ORBit was v0.5.0 in the
> lastest tarballs yet from cvs I only v0.4.93. I've been using the
> 'FOR_PANEL' tag (recommended some time ago), my question is should we still
> be using the 'FOR_PANEL' tag or can we do away with that now ?

I haven't been moving FOR_PANEL lately, but I made it point at 0.5.0
release for now - have at it.

-- Elliot					http://developer.gnome.org/
The first thing a programmer needs to admit is that any program is by far
more complex than his own mind. Thats why he partitions it into neat
pieces and avoids complexity.