Re: redhat-6.0: New Enlightenment focus behaviour
- From: "Peter C. Norton" <spacey-gnome-list lenin nu>
- To: Gregory McLean <gregm comstar net>
- Cc: frichard bbn com, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: redhat-6.0: New Enlightenment focus behaviour
- Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 20:37:10 -0700
I see something similar - sloppy focus seems to only get transferred
to the window under the pointer if the pointer actually crosses the
window frames border. If I switch desktops using alt+shift+arrow and
the mouse pointer lands squarely in the middle of a gnome-terminal,
and possibly other apps (emacs being a definite) the focus does not go
to the app - it's dead.
I don't know if this is the proper behavior. All I know is that fvwm
did this, so I came to expect it and it's lack is making me think
"windowmaker..."
-Peter
On Mon, May 03, 1999 at 08:59:25PM -0400, Gregory McLean wrote:
>
> I also have been having interesting focusing behavior with E and emacs..
> Under E emacs tends to be a focus black hole, this only happens on the machine
> at work so I just assumed it was the crappy hardware at work. But I have been
> seeing other reports of strange behavior between E and Emacs...
>
> When I say black hole, I mean it. If I have more then one emacs window open
> and move the mouse across the emacs window (it don't have to be on top just
> partially visible) It will get focus and the Xterm (or other window) that is
> the
> final destination never gets focus unless I slide mouse up to the title bar?
>
> Really strange. Same hardware with Window Maker and FVWM don't exhibit this
> oddity. (I use FFM (focus follows mouse))
>
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
--
The 5 year plan:
In five years we'll make up another plan.
Or just re-use this one.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]