Re: Gnome 1.0 on glibc 2.1?
- From: Ronald de Man <deman win tue nl>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gnome 1.0 on glibc 2.1?
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 01:17:19 +0100
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 05:56:43PM -0500, bratsche@dfw.net wrote:
>
> Starting program: /home/bratsche/game/canvas/test
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0 in ?? ()
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0 in ?? ()
> #1 0x4041b0db in buffered_vfprintf (s=0x404b17c0,
> format=0x40349740 "Unable to connect to server port %d\n",
> args=0xbffff744)
> at vfprintf.c:1726
> #2 0x40416923 in _IO_vfprintf (s=0x404b17c0,
> format=0x40349740 "Unable to connect to server port %d\n",
> ap=0xbffff744)
> at vfprintf.c:1018
> #3 0x4041e41d in fprintf (stream=0x404b17c0,
> format=0x40349740 "Unable to connect to server port %d\n") at
> fprintf.c:32
> #4 0x40346da3 in esd_open_sound ()
> #5 0x4033aa24 in gnome_sound_init ()
> #6 0x4033c6d7 in gnomelib_option_cb ()
> #7 0x403418e4 in invokeCallbacks ()
> #8 0x403418a9 in invokeCallbacks ()
> #9 0x403421c9 in poptGetNextOpt ()
> #10 0x4033969e in gnomelib_parse_args ()
> #11 0x4007afd8 in gnome_init_with_popt_table ()
> #12 0x4007b055 in gnome_init ()
> #13 0x8049366 in main ()
> #14 0x403eba93 in __libc_start_main (main=0x804934c <main>, argc=1,
> argv=0xbffff964, init=0x8048fac <_init>, fini=0x8049c2c <_fini>,
> rtld_fini=0x4000aa0c <_dl_fini>, stack_end=0xbffff95c)
> at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c:78
>
> ---
> This is not the fault of my test program; I receive the exact same
> backtrace using ee, or any other Gnome application. I've also checked to
> make sure that I don't have conflicting libraries installed, and I'm
> positive that I don't. This was not occuring with GNOME 0.99.8. I'll build
> gnome-libs out of CVS tonight when I get back from school, and report back
> as to whether it still happens. This problem is occuring from 1.0.1.
Ah I seem to remember this now. Try running esd and see if the problem
goes away. Of course it should work even when esd is not running, and
as far as I can tell this problem has been fixed already.
Ronald
>
> Cody
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]