RE: gtk+ and gtk-engines slow
- From: "Fox, Kevin M" <KMFox mail bhi-erc com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: gtk+ and gtk-engines slow
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:15:22 -0800
Well, It looks like it doesn't eat up too much memory. I have only 64 megs
in my box and it has 26 free right now. Running the seaGTK theme and E.
It looks like the cache is more of a cpu cache then a mem cache.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Hult [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 1999 9:10 PM
> To: KMFox@mail.bhi-erc.com
> Cc: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: gtk+ and gtk-engines slow
> On 22 Jan, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> > I just tried it as well. It does speed up the computer significantly.:)
> > If the cache is so much faster, shouldn't it default to cache instead of
> > defaulting to no cache?
> Well, it would eat a loooot of memory I guess... but I think it would be
> a good idea to always cache the pixmap-engine's pixmaps, if possible.
> Because otherwise I don't think the pixmap-engine is useable if you
> don't have a dual PII 450+ with the best graphics card available or so
> But I guess that someone that has the knowledge should take a look at
> m´why things get redrawn so many times... One is enough, 2 is a bit too
> much and 3 times is... not good.
] [Thread Prev