Re: Recent libraries are huge: new libtool/automake at fault?
- From: Alexander Jolk <jolk ap-pc513b physik uni-karlsruhe de>
- To: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- CC: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Recent libraries are huge: new libtool/automake at fault?
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 12:22:36 +0100 (MET)
James Henstridge writes:
> Stripping libraries will get you into all sorts of trouble (some of
> those symbols are used in the dynamic linking process). You are
> better off minimising the code size while compiling.
This was one point I had been thinking of. Is this actually true?
Doesn't strip on shared libraries merely remove unnecessary internal
symbols? I can't get my gnome-libs to compile because of the missing
sys/fsuid.h include, but what testing I'm able to do right now seems
to indicate programs run fine, even if dynamically linked with
stripped shared libs.
> Of course this reduces your ability to send in useful bug reports
> (back traces use these symbol tables and debugging information).
Granted...:-)
Alex
--
Alexander Jolk * jolk@ap-pc513b.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de * +49-721-608-3572
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]