RE: Drive-Mount bug continues, report if wanted.
- From: David Puryear <dayear codenet net>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: Drive-Mount bug continues, report if wanted.
- Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 02:55:43 -0700 (MST)
For me, I get this error when trying to start drive-mount:
-------------------------------
SOCKET XID: 14003AF
add callback ext: 80D6178
add callback ext: 80D6178
add callback ext: 80D6178
register ext: 80D6178
register ext->info: 80E2BE8
Here!
add 0x3000005
type = 2 exid = IDL:CORBA/MARSHAL:1.0
** CRITICAL **: file applet-widget.c: line 635 (gnome_panel_applet_corba_init):
assertion `ev._major == CORBA_NO_EXCEPTION' failed.
** CRITICAL **: file applet-widget.c: line 683 (applet_widget_new): assertion
`corbadat!=NULL' failed.
** ERROR **: Can't create applet!
aborting...
remove 0x3000005
remove 0x3000005
Gdk-Message: Got event for unknown window: 0x14003af
Gdk-Message: Got event for unknown window: 0x14003af
-----------------------------
This is using 0.99.3.1 core. I know that when drive-mount starts, it looks for
/mnt/floppy, which I don't have since mine is at /floppy. I would change it,
but I don't get the chance to see anything, just the error message. Also, I
start the panel at E-term since I like seeing what error messages I
get.:)
On the other hand, gtop works fine for me.
-David
On 17-Jan-99 Rebecca Ore wrote:
>
> Same old, same old after recompile of 0.99.3.1. I would feel a bit more
> motivated about providing a full bug report on this one if the developer
> wanted to apologize for the ill-considered remarks about using 0.99.0
> (wait a minute, it actually worked better in that tarball than in the
> later tarballs, maybe we have something there).
>
> Bug, I say. Maybe it's the interaction between the newest Orbit and the
> stale code from 0.99.0 when the drive-mount applet came the closest to
> working? Shrug. Or maybe the cvs updates didn't make it into the
> tarball due to the RAID mess-up. No way for me to check that.
>
> Wanda's sitting pretty, mini-commander, modem lights -- the usual
> suspects are okay. Drive-mount ain't okay, but if the developer wants
> to declare it okay on all systems other than mine, whether it is really
> or not, I certain won't argue with him. And I can't prove that it
> doesn't work just peachy keen on all other systems, either.
>
> And if it's really true, then there's nothing lost. I'll be getting a
> RedHat 5.2 system soon enough.
>
> Saves me time not to have to give a developer a bug report anyway. If he
> doesn't care, I don't.
>
> Funny how other things are working better, though, except for gtop.
> Broken pipe there when I try to run it in an xterm. Martin, back to you
> sometime tomorrow.
>
> --
> Rebecca Ore
>
>
> --
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]