Re: GNOME_STABLE--PURPOSE?
- From: bratsche dfw net
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>
- cc: dill2 netscape net, gnome-list gnome org, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: GNOME_STABLE--PURPOSE?
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 07:52:57 -0500 (EST)
How are new features being received? Or are they being received at all at
the moment?
Cody
On Mon, 4 Jan 1999, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> We thought it was going to be a good way to stabilize GNOME but it was
> a mistake. The problem is that HEAD and GNOME_STABLE were constantly
> getting out of sync (and we were spending far more time syncronizing
> the trees than fixing the code)
>
> Now we are putting carefully the code in HEAD.
>
> When GNOME 1.0 actually goes out, we will actually do a branch. Not
> before.
>
> Miguel.
>
>
> --
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
