Re: The State of GNOME
- From: SEGV <mlepage cgocable net>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: The State of GNOME
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 23:53:27 -0500
Richard Hult wrote:
> On 26 Feb, SEGV wrote:
> > Preben Randhol wrote:
> >> Albert Strasheim <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >> | I don't know how much of this instability is to be blamed on Gtk+/GLib
> >> | [which has really turned into a mess with the 1.0/1.1 issues], but it's
> >> | still most horrible.
> >> Well now 1.2 is here...
> > That in itself implies months of testing and debugging with the new libraries.
> > In the real world, you don't just drop new foundation libraries into place,
> > compile, and ship.
> Well, gtk+ 1.2 = gtk+ 1.1.x + months of testing and debugging.
You miss the point. GTK+ 1.2 itself may be tested and debugged, but GNOME using
GTK+ 1.2 has not.
MINION Project: http://www.cgocable.net/~mlepage/
RTS Game Programming: http://www.cgocable.net/~mlepage/rts/
] [Thread Prev