Re: The State of GNOME
- From: Richard Hult <rhult hem2 passagen se>
- To: mlepage cgocable net
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: The State of GNOME
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:32:49 -0500 (EST)
On 26 Feb, SEGV wrote:
> Preben Randhol wrote:
>>
>> Albert Strasheim <fullung@ilink.nis.za> writes:
>>
>> | I don't know how much of this instability is to be blamed on Gtk+/GLib
>> | [which has really turned into a mess with the 1.0/1.1 issues], but it's
>> | still most horrible.
>>
>> Well now 1.2 is here...
>
> That in itself implies months of testing and debugging with the new libraries.
> In the real world, you don't just drop new foundation libraries into place,
> compile, and ship.
Well, gtk+ 1.2 = gtk+ 1.1.x + months of testing and debugging.
Richard
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]