Re: The State of GNOME



On 26 Feb, SEGV wrote:
> Preben Randhol wrote:
>> 
>> Albert Strasheim <fullung@ilink.nis.za> writes:
>> 
>> | I don't know how much of this instability is to be blamed on Gtk+/GLib
>> | [which has really turned into a mess with the 1.0/1.1 issues], but it's
>> | still most horrible.
>> 
>> Well now 1.2 is here...
> 
> That in itself implies months of testing and debugging with the new libraries.
> In the real world, you don't just drop new foundation libraries into place,
> compile, and ship.

Well, gtk+ 1.2 = gtk+ 1.1.x + months of testing and debugging.

Richard




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]