RE: Ease of use (was Call for constructive user criticism.)

["Fox, Kevin M" <KMFox mail bhi-erc com>]

You have a point. Well, for gnome 2.0 programs, we can say "use libglade"
and do the 2 interfaces. Then whoever wants their program to be gnome 2.0
complient can use the new method. Older gnome 1.0 programs will still work,
but just wont be able to switch modes.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mawarkus@t-online.de [mailto:mawarkus@t-online.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 3:38 PM
> To: gnome-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: Ease of use (was Call for constructive user criticism.)
> 
> 
> +++ Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 02:57:43PM -0700 +++
> Fox, Kevin M e-mails me. Film at 11. Reply right now, after the break.
> > Actually, if libglade were to be used for all programs, you 
> would make your
> > 2 interfaces with glade (much easier then hand coding by 
> the way) and have a
> > simple if else statement in your main function to switch 
> between the two (or
> > more) glade intervaces. Using libglade would make the 
> program 100x smaller,
> > more flexable, and easier to code.  
> 
> But it would still mean redoing the interfaces of all the existing
> programs with Glade.
> 
> Have you got the manpower to do it? Can you assure that libglade-built
> interfaces have got all the necessary features?
> 
> mawa
> -- 
> Speaking for me, not for Microsoft.
> 
> 
> Mainly because I don't work for Microsoft.
> 
> 
> -- 
>         FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at 
> http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
>          To unsubscribe: mail 
> gnome-list-request@gnome.org with 
>                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>