Re: W3C as opensource "provider"
- From: Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis mindspring net>
- To: Daniel Veillard <Daniel Veillard w3 org>
- cc: "Eric S. Raymond" <esr thyrsus com>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: W3C as opensource "provider"
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 22:25:38 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 8 Sep 1998, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> Let me tell you that this kind of attitude definitely sucks !
I agree. The W3C is a highly-reputed standards body which carries a lot
of weight in The Real World. This blanket rule coincides poorly with the
goal of impressing corporations with the use of free software.
I guess I won't be submitting MindSpring's name to opensource.org.
Did you know that we were in the top .1% of all US stocks last year in
terms of market performance, and we run almost exclusively on open-source
software? Woops, I mean free software.
> Quoting Eric S. Raymond (esr@thyrsus.com):
>
> > I would cheerfully do this, except that that page is devoted to impressing
> > people who only care about money. So I don't list nonprofit organizations
> > there.
--
Todd Graham Lewis 32°49'N,83°36'W (800) 719-4664, x2804
******Linux****** MindSpring Enterprises tlewis@mindspring.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]