Re: Gnome success report, optimized compiling
- From: Kevin Miller <sar hempseed com>
- To: Richard Hult <rhult hem2 passagen se>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gnome success report, optimized compiling
- Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 18:37:33 -0500 (CDT)
I used egcs, seems to work fine...
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Richard Hult wrote:
> >Have you compiled gimp as such also? It really flies too...
> No, I haven't had the time to compile that big one ;) The linux kernel
> 2.1.125 had higher priority...
> >I compiled w/ optimizations about a week ago, and I had the same results,
> >I didnt compile with so many, just -06 -mpentium, and it made a big
> >difference compared to -02's speed.
> Hmm... did you use gcc or egcs? I read, after compiling with egcs, that
> it's not a good idea to use > -O2 because of bugs in egcs... it seems to
> work fine though...
] [Thread Prev