Re: gtk icewm?

[Toshio Kuratomi <badger prtr-13 ucsc edu>]

On Mon, 18 May, 1998 at 12:17:23PM -0400, raster@redhat.com set free these words:
> 
> next was well put together.. but again boring. MUI on the amiga was
> getting the right idea.. and it can be built on and imporved and
> changed in some ways... next still suffered from what I do believe GTK
> suffers form.. they "oh you run 1204x768 - you dont want more than one
> app open so lest fill your screen with extraneous pixels wasted in
> padding bordering etc." gtk looks good.. but I personally like haveing
> 10 apps open at once all visible without overlap.. yes i run high
> reses.. just to do this. the amiga has minimal use of screen-space for
> widgets.. no extraneous padding.. just good solid gadgets nicely
> packed.. :) but i'm not goign to complain.. tis just a "point" i'm
> making...
> 
Does anyone have an Amiga that they could do screenshots from that might
show off some of the good design features?  I'm sorry to say I've never had an
opportunity to look at an Amiga....

-Toshio
-- 
badger  \"Life is like a china candy dish, filled with brightly promising
@prtr-13 \ sweets, quickly empited.  lasts longer.  dropped.  it breaks."
.ucsc.edu  \~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

PGP signature