Re: ORB?
- From: Philip Dawes <philipd parallax co uk>
- To: "'gnome-list gnome org'" <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: ORB?
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 09:13:26 +0000
Elliot Lee wrote:
>
> FWIW, we can use the IR from Mico with any ORB (i.e. OmniORB). The biggest
> thing lacking with OmniORB is having a BOA that supports more activation
> policies... The OmniORB people will be adding DII and DSI "shortly".
>
> I've been playing with the OmniORB IDL compiler and have it generating
> something that looks like C header files ;-) If anyone cares to help out
> with an OmniORB angle on things, porting libomnithread to C might be a
> good start. libomniORB2 will also need porting to C eventually...
>
I'm confused. Are you considering porting the whole orb to C or just the
exposed bits?
Wouldn't it be easier to have a small wrapper library of exposed objects
(i.e. the standard corba ones) which aggregate to their C++
counterparts, and to have the idl compiler spit out C stubs which use
the C++ back end behind the scenes?
Cheers,
Phil.
--
_______________________________________________________________________
Phil Dawes | My opinions are my own
WWW: err.. temporarily non-existant | and nothing to do with
Email: philipd@parallax.co.uk | my employer.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]