gmp srpms (was Re: MICO RPMs?)



On Mon, 09 Feb, 1998 at 09:22:57PM -0800, George set free these words:
> > > I uploaded them to ftp.labs.redhat.com at the end of last week.
> > > Marc said he was going to look them over and then put them up
> > > w/ the rest of the stuff.  I figured he would have announced they
> > > were up by now.
> > 
> > Sorry about the delay.  I asked Jason to upload them, then promptly
> > forgot to look for them.  They are now in /pub/gnome-0.12.
> > 
> > If anyone else has RPMs for any gnome related stuff, please do
> > upload them to ftp.labs.redhat.com in /pub/incoming and send me
> > mail (I've put in a .message as a reminder).  I'll move them
> > into place.  I'll leave the announcements to the authors.
> 
> BTW: I didn't check ... you probably have the gmp srpms there ... the
> ones that were in the contrib were inherently broke since it was built
> by someone obviously not thinking about other platforms then i386 ... or
> are those newer RPMS ...?
> 
Now now, that was a long time ago.  I've learned a lot about packaging since
then.:-)

But to answer your question, I've downloaded the new SRPM and checked it out.
It's almost architecture neutral.  You'll have to edit one little line in
the SPEC file ::
    ./configure --target=i586-linux --prefix=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr

I think the correct semantics would be:
    ./configure --target=`uname -m`-`uname -s` --prefix=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr

(You want to leave --target in there because gmp does optimization based on
The arch/OS combination.... And for some reason it was just going for generic
without the --target switch.)

-Toshio
-- 
badger  \"The Difference between today and yesterday is not so much what has
@prtr-13 \ changed between then and now as what I hope to change by tomorrow."
.ucsc.edu  \~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]