Re: Why use guile?
- From: Ulric Eriksson <ulric edu stockholm se>
- To: Anthony Martin <amartin engr csulb edu>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Why use guile?
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 10:28:48 +0100 (MET)
On Sun, 8 Feb 1998, Anthony Martin wrote:
> If GNOME will only support one scripting language, then perhaps we will
> have separate projects split off from GNOME, i.e. PyGNOME, PerlGNOME, etc.
> similar to what has happened to FVWM. I think this would be a bad thing.
> Why does there have to be a a single "official" extension language?
Gnome shouldn't try to shove a single language down anybody's throat. The
idea of a "standard" or "default" scripting language is healthy, but that
is no reason to outlaw other languages. And I have seen no suggestions to
that effect.
Until Perl and Tcl are implemented on top of Guile (snicker, snicker)
there is no good alternative to having several scripting languages.
Ulric
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]