Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?

From: Tom Tromey <tromey cygnus com>
To: Felix Bellaby <felix pooh u-net com>
Cc: "Sergey I. Panov" <sipan mit edu>, Daniel Veillard w3 org, gnome-list gnome org
Subject: Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?
Date: 08 Dec 1998 20:27:12 -0700

Felix> BTW, many gnome apps have run time dependencies on
Felix> gnome-core. For example, they often use the gnome-help-browser
Felix> and gnome-session.  (xsm is not fully compliant with the
Felix> (POSIX) SM specs!)

Gnome applications with session management support don't actually
depend on gnome-session.  They ought to work fine if no session
manager is running.

I'd be suprised if the SM specs are related to POSIX in any way.

But as a practical matter I agree that xsm sucks.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- CVS dep tree, another attempt.
  - From: Sergey I. Panov
- Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?
  - From: Felix Bellaby

References:
- Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?
  - From: Daniel Veillard
- Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?
  - From: Sergey I. Panov
- Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?
  - From: Felix Bellaby

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]