Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?

From: Junichi Saito <j saito wanadoo fr>
To: Daniel Veillard <Daniel Veillard w3 org>
cc: "Sergey I. Panov" <sipan mit edu>, GNOME mailing list <gnome-list gnome org>, recipient list not shown: ;
Subject: Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 10:11:33 +0100 (CET)


On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Daniel Veillard wrote:

>glib
> |
> V
>gtk+                                           gnome-xml   imlib   gtk-engines
> |________________________________________        |         |          |
> |      |          |          |          |        |         |          |
> V      V          V          V          V        V         |          V
>ORBit libgtop  gnome-http  guile-core libgtop  gnome-dom    |      (optional)
> |      |          |          |          |        |         |
> |______|__________|__________|__________|________|_________|
> |

Dose guile-core depend on glib and gtk+ ? I usually compile it before
them, not that glib and gtk+ depend on guile-core, though. 

junichi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?
  - From: Martin Baulig

References:
- Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?
  - From: Daniel Veillard

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]